The new international order following the Cold War is gradually shifting towards a situation characterized by a more dispersed power structure, in which states that are not superpowers or small states affect events through diplomacy, alliance formation, and selective alignment. In this context, this research paper seeks to assess the role that the three prominent middle powers of India, Turkey, and Brazil play in a multipolar world. Through a qualitative comparative case study using structured comparison and based on secondary data provided by the World Bank and SIPRI, the paper examines the material basis, alignment behavior, and mediation by the states in question between 2010 and 2022. It is found that all three states engage in strategic autonomy by means of hedging and issue alliances; however, each state uses different institutional basis for its role as a middle power: India depends on multi-alignment and leadership of the Global South, Turkey on NATO membership with transactional mediation, and Brazil on normative diplomacy and group politics.
- Acharya, A. (2014). The end of American world order. Polity Press.
- Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. UBC Press.
- George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
- Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle powers in international politics. Macmillan.
- Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00511.x
- Jaishankar, S. (2020). The India way: Strategies for an uncertain world. HarperCollins.
- Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
- Kutlay, M., & Öniş, Z. (2021). Turkish foreign policy in a post-Western order: Strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence? International Affairs, 97(4), 1085–1104.
- Mohan, C. R. (2003). Crossing the Rubicon: The shaping of India’s new foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Narlikar, A. (2010). New powers: How to become one and how to manage them. Columbia University Press.
- Öniş, Z., & Kutlay, M. (2017). The dynamics of emerging middle-power influence in regional and global governance: The paradoxical case of Turkey. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1220491
- Stuenkel, O. (2015). The BRICS and the future of global order. Lexington Books.
- Tian, N., Lopes da Silva, D., Liang, X., & Scarazzato, L. (2022). Trends in world military expenditure, 2022. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- United Nations. (2022). Black Sea Grain Initiative. https://www.un.org/en/black-sea-grain-initiative
- Vigevani, T., & Cepaluni, G. (2007). Lula’s foreign policy and the quest for autonomy through diversification. Third World Quarterly, 28(7), 1309–1326.
- Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
- World Bank. (2022). World development indicators: GDP (current US$).
- Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
