With rapid shift to hybrid work in the Information Technology (IT) sector thanks to COVID-19, the reliance on digital platforms and tools in organizations has increased. Despite the flexibility and work-life balance that hybrid is providing, hybrid is also introducing a reliance of technology systems by employees, resulting in digital exhaustion. Digital exhaustion is the state of psychological, emotional and cognitive overload we suffer as a consequence of constant digital activity, constant online interaction, constant connection and technological overload. This is an empirical study about the effects of digital exhaustion on employees' engagement in hybrid working conditions in the IT-company. It was a quantitative study with the primary data obtained from 250 respondents who were IT professionals by using structured survey tools. Analytical techniques of correlation analysis, regression modelling and descriptive statistics were used in the interpretation of the data collected. Digital exhaustion has a significant impact on employee engagement, workplace productivity, employee motivation, and job satisfaction, as evidenced by results. Also, the work-life imbalance and the overload of communication are intermediate factors that aggravate the symptoms of digital fatigue. To keep employees engaged in a hybrid working model, enterprises must establish measures to cope with digital well-being, implement communication models, and develop all-round support systems for employees' psychological needs. The study helps to add to the academic discussion and debate around digital fatigue, hybrid workforce management and leadership, while offering actionable recommendations for HR practitioners and organizational leadership.
- Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(Foundational work introducing the concept of technostress.)
- Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433.
- Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436.
- Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Unsustainable working conditions: The association of technostressors and burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1–16.
- Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59.
- Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.
- Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590271.
- Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77.
- Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683.
- Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2021). Work from home & productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data. Journal of Labor Economics.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. (Seminal engagement theory.)
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
- Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
- Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
- Eurofound. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., Stuckey, R., Graham, M., & Weale, V. (2020). A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1825.
- Spagnoli, P., Molino, M., Molinaro, D., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). Workaholism and technostress during the COVID-19 emergency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5753.
- Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328.
- Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes. Information Systems Journal, 25(4), 355–401.
- Gaudioso, F., Turel, O., & Galimberti, C. (2017). The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating technostress creators into adverse job outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 189–196.
- Rani, M., Sharma, V., & Gupta, R. (2025). Digital fatigue and employee engagement in hybrid work: A multilevel perspective. Economic Sciences Journal, 14(2), 45–62.
- Mateen, A., Khan, H., & Ali, S. (2025). Employee well-being in hybrid work environments: Balancing productivity and digital burnout. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 18(1), 22–39.
- Li, X., Zhang, W., & Chen, Y. (2025). Protecting employee work engagement from digital fatigue in technology-enabled workplaces. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 30(4), 115–132.
- Mansuroğlu, E. (2026). Technostress and employee well-being: A systematic review of digital workplace fatigue. Digital Health Review, 11(1), 88–105.