ISO 9001:2015

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, MANAGEMENT & SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJARCMSS) [ Vol. 9 | No. 4 (I) | October - December, 2026 ]

Need for UN Security Council Reform: Veto Power and India’s Claim to Permanent Membership

Dr. Pritam Raj

Even though the membership of the United Nations has increased fourfold and the global balance of power has changed dramatically, the structure of the United Nations Security Council still retains the power structure of 1945. This paper reviews the arguments for the reform of the United Nations Security Council, focusing on the veto system and on the Indian claim for permanent membership. The paper is based on the doctrinal/criteria approach: the relevant provisions of the Charter and General Assembly resolutions are reviewed, the representation statistics of the different regions is compared, and the Indian case is evaluated based on the set of criteria. The results demonstrate the disproportional character of the United Nations Security Council membership as compared to the General Assembly, identify the veto system as the reason of paralysis in the crises situation, and prove that the Indian case for permanent membership is good in terms of population size, economic potential, and contribution to peacekeeping operations, while being challenged in terms of regional rivalry and unanimity for Charter amendments.

  1. Blum, Y. Z. (2005). Proposals for UN Security Council reform. American Journal of International Law, 99(3), 632–649.
  2. Bosco, D. L. (2009). Five to rule them all: The UN Security Council and the making of the modern world. Oxford University Press.
  3. Bourantonis, D. (2005). The history and politics of UN Security Council reform. Routledge.
  4. Fassbender, B. (1998). UN Security Council reform and the right of veto: A constitutional perspective. Kluwer Law International.
  5. Ganguly, S. (Ed.). (2010). India’s foreign policy: Retrospect and prospect. Oxford University Press.
  6. Hurd, I. (2007). After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton University Press.
  7. Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00511.x
  8. Malone, D. M. (2004). The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st century. Lynne Rienner.
  9. Mohan, C. R. (2003). Crossing the Rubicon: The shaping of India’s new foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Nadin, P. (2016). UN Security Council reform. Routledge.
  11. Thakur, R. (2006). The United Nations, peace and security. Cambridge University Press.
  12. United Nations. (n.d.). Regional groups of member states. https://www.un.org/dgacm/en/content/regional-groups
  13. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
  14. United Nations General Assembly. (1950). Uniting for peace (Resolution 377 (V)).
  15. United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Standing mandate for a General Assembly debate when a veto is cast in the Security Council (Resolution 76/262).
  16. Weiss, T. G. (2003). The illusion of UN Security Council reform. The Washington Quarterly, 26(4), 147–161.

DOI:

Article DOI:

DOI URL:


Download Full Paper:

Download