ISO 9001:2015

International Journal of Innovations & Research Analysis (IJIRA) [ Vol. 6 | No. 3(I) | July - September, 2026 ]

A Comparative Study of Private and Public Sector Banks in Bihar: An Analysis of Overall Banking Performance during 2019–2025

Kritika Kumari & Dr. Vinod Baitha

The banking sector occupies a central position in the economic development of Bihar because it connects household savings with productive investment, provides credit to agriculture and small businesses, supports government welfare programmes, and increasingly delivers financial services through digital channels. Within this banking system, public sector banks and private sector banks operate under the same regulatory framework but differ considerably in ownership, organizational structure, business strategies, technology adoption, customer service practices and geographical expansion. The present study makes a comparative assessment of the performance of public sector banks and private sector banks operating in Bihar during the period 2019–2025. The study is based primarily on secondary data obtained from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), State Level Bankers’ Committee (SLBC), annual reports of banks, government publications and relevant academic and institutional literature. The comparison considers multiple dimensions of banking performance rather than relying on a single indicator. These dimensions include deposit mobilisation, advances and credit delivery, credit-deposit ratio, profitability, asset quality, priority-sector lending, agricultural and MSME credit, branch expansion, financial inclusion, digital banking, customer service and operational efficiency. The study also considers the effects of the COVID-19 period and the subsequent recovery of the banking sector. The evidence indicates that public sector banks continue to have a dominant institutional role in Bihar because of their extensive branch network, historical presence, government-linked programmes, prioritysector responsibilities and reach among rural and financially underserved populations. At the same time, private sector banks have demonstrated considerable strengths in technology-driven services, digital delivery, customer-oriented products, operational flexibility and expansion in commercially attractive locations. Data reported by the SLBC show that as of 31 March 2025, public sector banks accounted for approximately ₹1,83,215 crore of outstanding advances in Bihar, while private sector banks accounted for approximately ₹85,497 crore. Public sector banks also accounted for a substantial share of priority-sector advances, agricultural lending and MSME credit.  The findings suggest that neither ownership model can be considered universally superior. Public sector banks remain particularly important for financial inclusion, rural outreach and developmental banking, whereas private sector banks show strong performance in technology, service innovation and selected efficiency dimensions. The paper concludes that the future of banking in Bihar depends less on choosing between public and private ownership and more on improving efficiency, digital accessibility, customer protection, credit quality and inclusive banking across both segments.

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  2. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  3. Government of India. (Various years). Reports and publications relating to financial inclusion and banking development. New Delhi.
  4. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
  5. Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176.
  6. Reserve Bank of India. (Various years). Annual Report. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
  7. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Annual Report 2024–25. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
  8. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Scheduled Banks’ Statement of Position in India. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
  9. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). RBI Bulletin and Weekly Statistical Supplement. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
  10. Reserve Bank of India. (Various years). Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India.Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.
  11. State Level Bankers’ Committee, Bihar. (Various years). Bank-wise and District-wise Deposits, Advances and Credit-Deposit Ratio Reports. Patna.
  12. State Level Bankers’ Committee, Bihar. (2025). 93rd SLBC Agenda Book, March 2025. Patna.
  13. State Level Bankers’ Committee, Bihar. (2025). Banking Network and Branch Reports. Patna.
  14. State Bank of India. (Various years). Annual Reports. Mumbai: State Bank of India.
  15. HDFC Bank. (Various years). Annual Reports. Mumbai: HDFC Bank Limited.
  16. ICICI Bank. (Various years). Annual Reports. Mumbai: ICICI Bank Limited.
  17. Axis Bank. (Various years). Annual Reports. Mumbai: Axis Bank Limited.
  18. Bandhan Bank. (Various years). Annual Reports. Kolkata: Bandhan Bank Limited.
  19. Deloitte. (Various years). Reports on digital transformation and banking in India.
  20. PwC India. (Various years). Reports on Indian banking, financial services and digital transformation.
  21. World Bank. (Various years). Reports on financial inclusion and digital transformation in India.
  22. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
  23. Varian, H. R. (2018). Artificial intelligence, economics, and industrial organisation. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence. University of Chicago Press.

DOI:

Article DOI:

DOI URL:


Download Full Paper:

Download