Online Registration

ISO 9001:2015

INSPIRA-JOURNAL OF MODERN MANAGEMENT & ENTREPRENEURSHIP(JMME) [ Vol. 16 | No. 1(II) | January - March, 2026 ]

Grassroots Political Movements and their Impact on Local Governance

Dr. Parmeshwari Bagra

Grassroots political movements function as essential elements which enhance democratic systems through their ability to engage citizens and shape municipal administration. The study investigates how grassroots movements operate at the local level to impact decision-making procedures which affect their community. Community organizations use their programs to engage citizens who then learn about local problems while they work to keep government entities responsible. Grassroots movements usually form through community-based organizations which work to solve problems related to public services and environmental protection and social justice and transparent governance. The movements use collective action and public participation and community leadership as their main methods to achieve social transformation. The organizations function as intermediaries who connect citizens with municipal governments while they make sure that disadvantaged communities can express their opinions. The research demonstrates that grassroots movements create substantial changes in local government operations through their ability to raise political knowledge among citizens and drive community engagement and their commitment to transparent government practices. The organization uses community resources to create better policies through its process of identifying essential local requirements and main community priorities. The organization faces obstacles because it operates with restricted resources and it lacks institutional backing and its activities encounter political opposition. The paper concludes that grassroots political movements serve as fundamental elements which support democratic governance through their operation at local government levels. The movements accomplish their goals by empowering citizens to take part in decision-making processes which boosts government transparency and responsiveness and citizen eligibility for participation. The implementation of better support systems for these initiatives will result in improved performance of local governance operations which will help build trustworthy systems.

  1. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Polity Press.
  2. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.
  3. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak. Yale University Press.
  4. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
  6. Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.
  7. Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking participation. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
  8. Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development. World Bank.
  9. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Intermediate Technology.
  10. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
  11. Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability. World Development, 72, 346–361.
  12. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). Digital media and action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.
  13. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. Polity Press.
  15. Heller, P. (2001). Moving the state. Politics & Society, 29(1), 131–163.

DOI:

Article DOI:

DOI URL:

Download Full Paper:

Download