ISO 9001:2015

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, MODERN MANAGEMENT, APPLIED SCIENCE & SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJEMMASSS) [ Vol. 8 | No. 1 (II) | January - March, 2026 ]

Critical Analysis of Sustainable Development: Concept and Reality

Dr. Vijay Khichar, Dr. Abhishek Lunayach & Dr. Hansa Lunayach

Sustainable development has emerged as the most important development framework which people debate in current development discussions. The 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development report introduced sustainable development as a concept which allowed economic growth to continue while protecting environmental resources and promoting social equality through sustainable development, which required present needs to be satisfied without harming future generations. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have established this concept as a worldwide framework which governs both international partnerships and the policy development processes of various nations. This paper presents a critical assessment of sustainable development by examining its theoretical foundations, essential conceptual uncertainties, and the implementation difficulties which need to be overcome. The study investigates how economic systems that focus on growth create conflicts with ecological sustainability because development models choose to achieve immediate economic benefits instead of protecting environmental and social systems. The study uses recent global assessments from the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the UN SDG Progress Report 2024 to show how normative commitments diverge from actual empirical observations. The world still experiences persistent problems including climate change and resource overexploitation and biodiversity loss and structural inequalities which prevent societies from achieving their sustainability objectives. The paper studies how global political economic systems create structural limitations through three main factors which include uneven consumer behaviour and different levels of technology access and the fundamental needs of capital accumulation. The research shows that organizations which use sustainability language in their work do not necessarily implement substantial changes to their operational procedures or develop sustainable practices. The study ends with a proposal for creating a framework which enables better understanding of sustainable development through its local context while implementing inclusive governance practices and fair resource distribution and sustainable development programs which focus on local needs and economic growth which extends beyond material accumulation. This method serves as a vital connection point which unites the theoretical potential of sustainable development with its actual implementation in practice.

Khichar, V., Lunayach, A. & Lunayach, H. (2026). Critical Analysis of Sustainable Development: Concept and Reality. International Journal of Education, Modern Management, Applied Science & Social Science, 08(01(II)), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.62823/IJEMMASSS/8.1(II).8703
  1. Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Methuen, London.
  2. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  3. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. United Nations, New York.
  4. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. United Nations, New York.
  5. Grober, U. (2012). Sustainability: A Cultural History. Green Books, Totnes.
  6. Nash, R.F. (2014). Wilderness and the American Mind (5th ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven.
  7. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York.
  8. Adams, W.M. (2009). Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in a Developing World (3rd ed.). Routledge, London.
  9. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. United Nations, New York.
  10. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/55/2. United Nations, New York.
  11. Convention on Biological Diversity. (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/COP/15/L.25. United Nations, Montreal.
  12. Solow, R.M. (1993). Sustainability: An economist's perspective. In R. Dorfman & N.S. Dorfman (Eds.), Economics of the Environment (3rd ed., pp. 179–187). Norton, New York.
  13. Daly, H.E. (1996). Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Beacon Press, Boston.
  14. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.
  15. Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
  16. Stern, D.I. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 7–28.
  17. Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Agenda Publishing, Newcastle.
  18. Jacobs, M. (2012). Green growth: Economic theory and political discourse. Working Paper, Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics.
  19. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486.
  20. Bullard, R.D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (3rd ed.). Westview Press, Boulder.
  21. IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  22. Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  23. Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012). Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 237–261.
  24. Sovacool, B.K., & Turnheim, B. (2024). Sociotechnical innovation and low-carbon transitions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49, 1–28.
  25. Sorrell, S. (2009). Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1456–1469.
  26. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. FAO, Rome.
  27. Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M.W., et al. (2023). Global Carbon Budget 2023. Earth System Science Data, 15(12), 5301–5369.
  28. UNFCCC Secretariat. (2023). Synthesis Report on the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement. UNFCCC, Bonn.
  29. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn.
  30. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., et al. (2023). Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37), eadh2458.
  31. Lewis, S.L. (2012). We must set planetary boundaries wisely. Nature, 485(7399), 417.
  32. European Environment Agency. (2021). Growth Without Economic Growth. EEA Briefing No. 02/2021. EEA, Copenhagen.
  33. IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  34. O'Connor, J. (1998). Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. Guilford Press, New York.
  35. Lazonick, W., & Mazzucato, M. (2013). The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 1093–1128.
  36. Sullivan, S. (2013). Banking nature? The spectacular financialisaton of environmental conservation. Antipode, 45(1), 198–217.
  37. West, T.A.P., Wunder, S., Sills, E.O., et al. (2023). Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science, 381(6660), 873–877.
  38. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.62823/IJEMMASSS/8.1(II).8703

DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.62823/IJEMMASSS/8.1(II).8703


Download Full Paper:

Download