The Indian economy has witnessed a rapid shift toward cashless transactions, especially following the 2020 pandemic. Traditionally, transactions required physical currency such as notes or coins, but the advent of digital payments has transformed how money is exchanged. While digitalization has brought convenience and efficiency, this transaction raises critical questions about its true economic impact and feasibility. This research paper seeks to critically examine the economic implications of digital payments. Are these transactions truly economical for users? For instance, in the past, owning a physical wallet was a one-time expense, often costing no more than Rs. 500 and lasting years. In contrast, the shift to digital wallets requires users to own a smartphone-an expensive purchase-and incur recurring costs for internet connectivity. Is this truly more economical in the long run? Additionally, the power and control over money have shifted to third party platforms. Unlike cash, which provides complete autonomy to users, digital transactions rely on intermediaries who can impose restrictions, deny transactions, or charge fees. This raises concerns about financial independence and security in a cashless economy. Furthermore, the reliance on technology has introduced significant dependency. Digital payments require a functioning smartphone, a stable internet connection, and access to the digital ecosystem. In cases of network outages, internet bans, or device theft, individuals are left unable to transact, highlighting the vulnerability of a cashless system. In contrast, cash transactions offer greater flexibility and independence, as cash can be used and exchanged freely without technological barriers. This paper explores these issues in depth, questioning whether India’s move towards a cashless economy is truly economical, sustainable, or beneficial for its diverse population. While digital payments offer modern convenience, they also come with hidden costs, dependency, and challenges to financial autonomy that must be critically evaluated.